When a Little Fraud is OK

Apparently because there is no known widespread evidence of fraud sufficient to overturn an election, we’re good to go. Get the platform built, put the podium in place and let’s throw an inaugural ball.

It’s lost on me how the fact that there was some evidence of fraud can be set aside in the quest to “move on”. If there was one, could there be more? Shouldn’t we at least see how many instances of fraud occurred and more importantly, how they came to be? Shouldn’t everyone be on board with getting the process as secure as possible? One where any breeches can be easily identified and quickly dealt with.

The more resistance to investigating all the allegations there are, the more suspicious there is something to investigate. Granted, there may not be enough to overturn the election, but there are many more elections to come and if we’re going to spend  billions changing regimes, we had better get it right and with less stress. The integrity of our elections is fundamental to our ability to survive as a Democratic Republic. On that, all the pundits and politicians are right. So why aren’t all of them screaming to find our how the Presidential election went from Donald Trump at midnight to Joe Biden at dawn?

The statistical aberrations in the current tabulation should cause even the most ardent leftists to say it was highly unusual. For example, Trump got 2 million more votes than in 2016 in counties ravaged by the pandemic, yet that was the number one Democrat issue. (https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/11/us-united-states-america-presidential-election-president-statistics/). Trump got the 2^nd highest number of votes in history. Guess who got the most…? Trump won Ohio which has been on the winning side of presidential elections 93% of the time. Only he and Grover Cleveland 132 years ago, lost despite increasing their number of votes. (https://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2020/11/statistical_anomalies_in_the_2020_presidential_election.html)

As telling about what is happening in our country is how I came to find some of this information. If you Google “statistical anomalies for 2020 presidential election” you’ll get all kinds of results from the various states and “news” outlets and nothing on historical differences. On Bing search, you get all kinds of repudiation of results and other sites that raise questions about how this election was conducted.

Those of you relying on “the internet” for your fact checking had better fact check your fact checks. We’re all in this together.